↓ Skip to main content

Evidence for transmission of Plasmodium vivax among a duffy antigen negative population in Western Kenya.

Overview of attention for article published in The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, October 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
197 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Evidence for transmission of Plasmodium vivax among a duffy antigen negative population in Western Kenya.
Published in
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, October 2006
DOI 10.4269/ajtmh.2006.75.575
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

We present evidence that a parasite with characteristics of Plasmodium vivax is being transmitted among Duffy blood group-negative inhabitants of Kenya. Thirty-two of 4,901 Anopheles gambiae and An. funestus (0.65%) collected in Nyanza Province were ELISA positive for the P. vivax circumsporozoite protein VK 247. All positives were found late in the rainy season, when An. funestus predominated, and disproportionately many were found at a single village. A P. vivax specific sequence of the SSU rRNA gene was amplified from three of six ELISA-positive mosquitoes. Erythrocytes from 31 children, including 9 microscopically diagnosed as infected with P. vivax, were negative by flow cytometry for the Fy3 or Fy6 epitopes, which indicate Duffy blood group expression. A DNA fragment specific for the C terminus of the gene for P. vivax merozoite surface protein 1 (MSP-1) was amplified from the blood of four of these children and subsequently sequenced from two.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 197 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Thailand 2 1%
India 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Madagascar 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 187 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 18%
Researcher 35 18%
Student > Master 29 15%
Student > Bachelor 21 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 9%
Other 25 13%
Unknown 35 18%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 69 35%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 33 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 30 15%
Immunology and Microbiology 10 5%
Environmental Science 4 2%
Other 12 6%
Unknown 39 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2026.
All research outputs
#4,629,744
of 34,457,357 outputs
Outputs from The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
#1,544
of 11,481 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,454
of 125,805 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
#4
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,457,357 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,481 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 125,805 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.