↓ Skip to main content

Development and validation of mathematical models for testing antifungal activity of different essential oils against Candida species

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Oral Biology, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Development and validation of mathematical models for testing antifungal activity of different essential oils against Candida species
Published in
Archives of Oral Biology, December 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2018.11.029
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mirjana Perić, Katarina Rajković, Aleksandra Milić Lemić, Rade Živković, Valentina Arsić Arsenijević

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 57 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 14%
Student > Bachelor 8 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 11%
Student > Postgraduate 5 9%
Researcher 3 5%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 19 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 7%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 4%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 23 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2019.
All research outputs
#20,663,600
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Oral Biology
#1,301
of 1,832 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#340,752
of 445,442 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Oral Biology
#15
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,832 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,442 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.