↓ Skip to main content

Virological factors that increase the transmissibility of emerging human viruses

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
43 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
twitter
77 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users
reddit
10 Redditors
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Readers on

mendeley
274 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Virological factors that increase the transmissibility of emerging human viruses
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, March 2016
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1521582113
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 77 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 274 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 4 1%
Brazil 3 1%
Italy 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 264 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 53 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 47 17%
Student > Bachelor 38 14%
Student > Master 25 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 5%
Other 42 15%
Unknown 56 20%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 80 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 41 15%
Immunology and Microbiology 28 10%
Environmental Science 15 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 4%
Other 28 10%
Unknown 70 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 421. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2024.
All research outputs
#87,759
of 34,443,102 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#1,993
of 119,056 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,320
of 338,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#40
of 893 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,443,102 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 119,056 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,215 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 893 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.