↓ Skip to main content

Analyzing Lateral Root Development: How to Move Forward

Overview of attention for article published in Plant Cell, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
380 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Analyzing Lateral Root Development: How to Move Forward
Published in
Plant Cell, January 2012
DOI 10.1105/tpc.111.094292
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Roots are important to plants for a wide variety of processes, including nutrient and water uptake, anchoring and mechanical support, storage functions, and as the major interface between the plant and various biotic and abiotic factors in the soil environment. Therefore, understanding the development and architecture of roots holds potential for the manipulation of root traits to improve the productivity and sustainability of agricultural systems and to better understand and manage natural ecosystems. While lateral root development is a traceable process along the primary root and different stages can be found along this longitudinal axis of time and development, root system architecture is complex and difficult to quantify. Here, we comment on assays to describe lateral root phenotypes and propose ways to move forward regarding the description of root system architecture, also considering crops and the environment.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 380 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 6 2%
United Kingdom 4 1%
Belgium 4 1%
Germany 3 <1%
Argentina 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Philippines 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 355 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 92 24%
Researcher 79 21%
Student > Master 44 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 24 6%
Student > Bachelor 24 6%
Other 64 17%
Unknown 53 14%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 237 62%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 31 8%
Environmental Science 19 5%
Engineering 9 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 1%
Other 17 4%
Unknown 63 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2020.
All research outputs
#27,765,099
of 34,410,798 outputs
Outputs from Plant Cell
#7,801
of 8,063 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#251,858
of 299,758 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Cell
#59
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,798 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,063 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 299,758 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.