↓ Skip to main content

CTLA-4 downregulates epitope spreading and mediates remission in relapsing experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neuroimmunology, September 2000
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
CTLA-4 downregulates epitope spreading and mediates remission in relapsing experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis
Published in
Journal of Neuroimmunology, September 2000
DOI 10.1016/s0165-5728(00)00322-2
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

During the progression of relapsing experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (R-EAE), in SJL mice, disease relapses are mediated by T cells specific for non-cross-reactive myelin epitopes, a process termed 'epitope spreading'. CTLA-4, a negative regulator of T cell function modulates R-EAE, in that CTLA-4 blockade exacerbates clinical R-EAE. Herein, we show that CTLA-4-mediated signaling negatively regulates the dynamic spread of autoreactive T cell responses during the course of autoimmune disease. Anti-CTLA-4 mAb, administration at various points during the progression of R-EAE exacerbated subsequent clinical disease and enhanced T cell reactivity to both inducing and relapse-associated epitopes. In addition, CTLA-4 blockade during acute disease inhibited clinical remission. Thus, CTLA-4-mediated events are critical for intrinsic regulation of epitope spreading during autoimmune disease.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 40 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 35%
Professor 6 15%
Student > Master 3 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 8%
Other 2 5%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 9 23%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 12 30%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 8%
Neuroscience 3 8%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 6 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2006.
All research outputs
#9,515,628
of 27,780,120 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuroimmunology
#1,037
of 3,073 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,555
of 42,831 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuroimmunology
#9
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,780,120 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,073 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 42,831 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.