↓ Skip to main content

Cloning and Functional Characterization of the Early-Lymphocyte-Specific Pb99 Gene

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular & Cellular Biology, March 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Cloning and Functional Characterization of the Early-Lymphocyte-Specific Pb99 Gene
Published in
Molecular & Cellular Biology, March 2023
DOI 10.1128/mcb.20.12.4405-4410.2000
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The Pb99 gene is specifically expressed in pre-B cells and thymocytes and not in mature B and T cells or nonlymphoid tissues, implying that it may function in early lymphoid development. We have previously described the cloning of an incomplete cDNA for Pb99. Here we report the isolation of full-length cDNAs and genomic clones for the murine Pb99 gene and the mapping of its location to mouse chromosome 8. Sequence analyses of different Pb99 cDNA clones suggest that there may be at least three forms of the Pb99 protein generated by differential processing of the Pb99 transcript. The cDNA with the longest open reading frame encodes a putative protein that has seven hydrophobic domains similar to those of seven membrane-spanning proteins, such as the classical G protein-coupled receptors. To directly address the role of the Pb99 protein in lymphoid development, Pb99-deficient mice were generated by gene targeting, and lymphocyte development in these mice was analyzed.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 4 24%
Researcher 3 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 12%
Student > Master 1 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 5 29%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 29%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 6%
Chemistry 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 7 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2011.
All research outputs
#12,527,423
of 34,763,505 outputs
Outputs from Molecular & Cellular Biology
#6,658
of 14,100 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#165,899
of 451,423 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular & Cellular Biology
#4,908
of 10,456 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,763,505 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,100 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,423 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10,456 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.