↓ Skip to main content

Designer disordered materials with large, complete photonic band gaps

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, December 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
patent
11 patents
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
315 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Designer disordered materials with large, complete photonic band gaps
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, December 2009
DOI 10.1073/pnas.0907744106
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

We present designs of 2D, isotropic, disordered, photonic materials of arbitrary size with complete band gaps blocking all directions and polarizations. The designs with the largest band gaps are obtained by a constrained optimization method that starts from a hyperuniform disordered point pattern, an array of points whose number variance within a spherical sampling window grows more slowly than the volume. We argue that hyperuniformity, combined with uniform local topology and short-range geometric order, can explain how complete photonic band gaps are possible without long-range translational order. We note the ramifications for electronic and phononic band gaps in disordered materials.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 315 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 5 2%
United Kingdom 4 1%
Italy 3 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Hungary 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 297 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 87 28%
Researcher 66 21%
Student > Master 29 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 5%
Professor 15 5%
Other 43 14%
Unknown 58 18%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 141 45%
Engineering 47 15%
Materials Science 31 10%
Chemistry 12 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 <1%
Other 12 4%
Unknown 69 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2026.
All research outputs
#1,209,374
of 34,377,743 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#17,248
of 118,941 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,314
of 239,007 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#75
of 949 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,377,743 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 118,941 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,007 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 949 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.