↓ Skip to main content

Diaphragm paralysis caused by transverse cervical artery compression of the phrenic nerve: The Red Cross syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Neurology & Neurosurgery, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page
podcasts
1 podcast

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Diaphragm paralysis caused by transverse cervical artery compression of the phrenic nerve: The Red Cross syndrome
Published in
Clinical Neurology & Neurosurgery, February 2012
DOI 10.1016/j.clineuro.2012.01.048
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The etiology of diaphragm paralysis is often elusive unless an iatrogenic or traumatic injury to the phrenic nerve can be clearly implicated. Until recently, there has been little interest in the pathophysiology of diaphragm paralysis since few treatment options existed.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Unknown 36 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 11%
Student > Master 4 11%
Other 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 11 30%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Mathematics 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 12 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2025.
All research outputs
#3,018,120
of 34,410,798 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Neurology & Neurosurgery
#81
of 2,536 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,117
of 202,805 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Neurology & Neurosurgery
#1
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,798 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,536 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,805 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.