You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Extremes of heat, drought and precipitation depress reproductive performance in shortgrass prairie passerines
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ibis, May 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1111/ibi.12373 |
| Authors |
Reesa Y. Conrey, Susan K. Skagen, Amy A. Yackel Adams, Arvind O. Panjabi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 33% |
| Australia | 1 | 17% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 17% |
| Faroe Islands | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 114 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 30 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 18% |
| Researcher | 18 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 12% |
| Other | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 11% |
| Unknown | 13 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 54 | 47% |
| Environmental Science | 30 | 26% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 3% |
| Linguistics | 1 | <1% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 3% |
| Unknown | 22 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2016.
All research outputs
#7,145,137
of 23,508,125 outputs
Outputs from Ibis
#1,229
of 2,810 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,962
of 303,367 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ibis
#19
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,508,125 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,810 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 303,367 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.