↓ Skip to main content

津波リスク最小化のための送迎避難交通の最適動的制御とその求解方法

Overview of attention for article published in JSTE Journal of Traffic Engineering, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
津波リスク最小化のための送迎避難交通の最適動的制御とその求解方法
Published in
JSTE Journal of Traffic Engineering, April 2017
DOI 10.14954/jste.3.3_1
Authors

浦田 淳司, 羽藤 英二

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 1 50%
Student > Master 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 2 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2019.
All research outputs
#21,049,824
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from JSTE Journal of Traffic Engineering
#42
of 45 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#250,952
of 325,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JSTE Journal of Traffic Engineering
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 45 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one scored the same or higher as 3 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,313 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.