↓ Skip to main content

Recreational trampling negatively impacts vegetation structure of an Australian biodiversity hotspot

Overview of attention for article published in Biodiversity and Conservation, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Recreational trampling negatively impacts vegetation structure of an Australian biodiversity hotspot
Published in
Biodiversity and Conservation, July 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10531-015-0957-x
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 90 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 13 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 13%
Researcher 11 12%
Student > Master 10 11%
Lecturer 6 7%
Other 13 14%
Unknown 25 28%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 25 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 16%
Social Sciences 5 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Mathematics 2 2%
Other 11 12%
Unknown 31 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2018.
All research outputs
#9,015,551
of 26,618,366 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#1,237
of 2,522 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,530
of 277,996 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#14
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,618,366 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,522 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,996 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.