↓ Skip to main content

Bladder Distension Increases Blood Flow in Pain Related Brain Structures in Subjects with Interstitial Cystitis

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Urology, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Bladder Distension Increases Blood Flow in Pain Related Brain Structures in Subjects with Interstitial Cystitis
Published in
The Journal of Urology, March 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.juro.2016.03.135
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

In Healthy Control subjects (HCs) certain brain regions of interest (ROIs) demonstrate increased regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) in response to painful stimuli. The effect of bladder distension on arterial spin label-functional MRI (ASL-fMRI) measures of rCBF within ROIs was examined in subjects with Interstitial Cystitis (ICs). Female ICs (n= 11) and HCs (n=11) underwent three brain perfusion scan studies using ASL-fMRI: with a full bladder; with an empty bladder; and while experiencing heat pain. rCBF was calculated using custom software and individual scans were spatially normalized to the MNI template. An analysis was performed of ROI-based absolute rCBF in each condition and of the within group/within subject rCBF distribution changes induced by each condition. Bladder distension was associated with robust increases in rCBF in ICs greater than that of HCs in multiple ROIs including the Supplemental Motor Area (mainly Brodmann's Area 6), motor and sensory cortex, the insula bilaterally, hippocampal structures bilaterally and the middle and posterior cingulate areas bilaterally. During heat pain, HCs had more robust rCBF increases in the amygdala bilaterally. At baseline with an empty bladder, there was a lower rCBF level in the insula and mid- and posterior cingulate cortex bilaterally of ICs. Compared to HCs, ICs have limited differences in rCBF in baseline (empty bladder) conditions as well as during heat pain, but robust rCBF increases in the full bladder state in ROIs typically associated with pain, emotion and/or motor control indicating altered processing of bladder-related sensations.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 16%
Researcher 6 16%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 6 16%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 16%
Neuroscience 5 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 11%
Psychology 3 8%
Sports and Recreations 2 5%
Other 8 22%
Unknown 9 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2017.
All research outputs
#6,385,056
of 34,350,842 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Urology
#4,369
of 21,939 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,259
of 339,119 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Urology
#82
of 477 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,350,842 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,939 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,119 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 477 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.