↓ Skip to main content

Stigmatizing Images in Obesity Health Campaign Messages and Healthy Behavioral Intentions

Overview of attention for article published in Health Education & Behavior, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
150 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Stigmatizing Images in Obesity Health Campaign Messages and Healthy Behavioral Intentions
Published in
Health Education & Behavior, September 2015
DOI 10.1177/1090198115604624
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Antiobesity campaigns blaming individual behaviors for obesity have sparked concern that an emphasis on individual behavior may lead to stigmatization of overweight or obese people. Past studies have shown that perpetuating stigma is not effective for influencing behavior. This study examined whether stigmatizing or nonstigmatizing images and text in antiobesity advertisements led to differences in health-related behavioral intentions. Participants in this experiment were 161 American adults. Measures included self-reported body mass index, weight satisfaction, antifat attitudes, and intention to increase healthy behaviors. Images in particular prompted intention to increase healthy behavior, but only among participants who were not overweight or obese. Images and text emphasizing individual responsibility for obesity may influence behavioral intention among those who are not overweight, but they do not seem to be effective at altering behavioral intentions among overweight people, the target audience for many antiobesity messages. Images in antiobesity messages intended to alter behavior are influential and should be selected carefully.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 150 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 20 13%
Researcher 16 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 10%
Student > Master 13 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 6%
Other 25 17%
Unknown 52 35%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 18 12%
Psychology 17 11%
Social Sciences 11 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 7 5%
Other 27 18%
Unknown 61 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2020.
All research outputs
#11,109,863
of 33,779,198 outputs
Outputs from Health Education & Behavior
#822
of 1,750 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,452
of 288,138 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Education & Behavior
#18
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,779,198 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,750 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,138 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.