↓ Skip to main content

Separating pitch chroma and pitch height in the human brain

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, August 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
patent
3 patents
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
178 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Separating pitch chroma and pitch height in the human brain
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, August 2003
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1730682100
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Musicians recognize pitch as having two dimensions. On the keyboard, these are illustrated by the octave and the cycle of notes within the octave. In perception, these dimensions are referred to as pitch height and pitch chroma, respectively. Pitch chroma provides a basis for presenting acoustic patterns (melodies) that do not depend on the particular sound source. In contrast, pitch height provides a basis for segregation of notes into streams to separate sound sources. This paper reports a functional magnetic resonance experiment designed to search for distinct mappings of these two types of pitch change in the human brain. The results show that chroma change is specifically represented anterior to primary auditory cortex, whereas height change is specifically represented posterior to primary auditory cortex. We propose that tracking of acoustic information streams occurs in anterior auditory areas, whereas the segregation of sound objects (a crucial aspect of auditory scene analysis) depends on posterior areas.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 178 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 2%
United States 2 1%
Netherlands 2 1%
France 2 1%
Germany 2 1%
Norway 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 163 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 40 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 19%
Professor 20 11%
Student > Master 16 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 14 8%
Other 36 20%
Unknown 18 10%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 63 35%
Neuroscience 21 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 6%
Arts and Humanities 10 6%
Other 23 13%
Unknown 32 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2023.
All research outputs
#9,230,768
of 34,400,738 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#74,086
of 118,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,657
of 76,940 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#292
of 470 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,400,738 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 118,992 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.1. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,940 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 470 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.