↓ Skip to main content

落下と反復のスペクタクル

Overview of attention for article published in eizogaku, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#48 of 111)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
落下と反復のスペクタクル
Published in
eizogaku, January 2019
DOI 10.18917/eizogaku.101.0_49
Authors

雑賀 広海

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2023.
All research outputs
#14,612,917
of 25,600,774 outputs
Outputs from eizogaku
#48
of 111 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#219,611
of 448,115 outputs
Outputs of similar age from eizogaku
#6
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,600,774 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 111 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,115 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.