↓ Skip to main content

COLLEGE STUDENTS' RESPONDING TO AND RATING OF CONTINGENCY RELATIONS: THE ROLE OF TEMPORAL CONTIGUITY

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
COLLEGE STUDENTS' RESPONDING TO AND RATING OF CONTINGENCY RELATIONS: THE ROLE OF TEMPORAL CONTIGUITY
Published in
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, February 2013
DOI 10.1901/jeab.1986.46-15
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 6%
Japan 1 3%
Unknown 28 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 10 32%
Researcher 8 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 13%
Lecturer 2 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 2 6%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 24 77%
Social Sciences 2 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 6%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2019.
All research outputs
#20,059,417
of 24,654,416 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
#664
of 1,011 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#151,510
of 197,160 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
#368
of 483 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,654,416 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,011 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,160 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 483 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.