| Title |
Very Early Constraint-Induced Movement during Stroke Rehabilitation (VECTORS)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Neurology, May 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1212/wnl.0b013e3181ab2b27 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
A W Dromerick, C E Lang, R L Birkenmeier, J M Wagner, J P Miller, T O Videen, W J Powers, S L Wolf, D F Edwards |
| Abstract |
Constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT) is among the most developed training approaches for motor restoration of the upper extremity (UE). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Turkey | 1 | 20% |
| Spain | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 501 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Hong Kong | 2 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Russia | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 483 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 83 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 75 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 60 | 12% |
| Researcher | 59 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 31 | 6% |
| Other | 102 | 20% |
| Unknown | 91 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 138 | 28% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 72 | 14% |
| Neuroscience | 72 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 28 | 6% |
| Engineering | 20 | 4% |
| Other | 59 | 12% |
| Unknown | 112 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2021.
All research outputs
#2,355,616
of 23,613,071 outputs
Outputs from Neurology
#4,549
of 20,309 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,747
of 98,609 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurology
#15
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,613,071 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,309 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 98,609 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.