Glaucoma is common in patients with the Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis (KPro). Because of the inability to perform corneal applanation in KPro patients, digital palpation is currently the mainstay for assessment of intraocular pressure (IOP). The purpose of this study was to determine whether the Diaton tonometer, which estimates IOP through transpalpebral scleral indentation, can reasonably detect high IOP when compared with Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) in patients with ocular hypertension, glaucoma, or glaucoma tube shunts. If reliable in these patients, it may be helpful in patients with KPros.
We prospectively measured IOP using GAT and Diaton transpalpebral tonometry (DTT) on the upper and lower eyelids in 87 eyes of 57 adult participants with ocular hypertension and glaucoma, several of whom had glaucoma tube shunts.
The correlation coefficient between GAT and DTT on the upper eyelid was 0.64 (P<0.0001). For detecting an IOP of >21 mm Hg as measured by GAT, DTT on the upper eyelid had a sensitivity and specificity of 65% and 81%, respectively. The positive and negative predictive values were 74% and 73%, respectively. Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated limits of agreement of 2.0±19.5 mm Hg for GAT versus DTT on the upper eyelid. The presence of a tube shunt did not significantly affect the results.
Diaton tonometry has a large margin of error compared with GAT in patients with ocular hypertension, glaucoma, and glaucoma tube shunts. However, given the current lack of an objective and quantitative method of IOP measurement in KPro patients, Diaton tonometry may be useful in this population as a supplement to digital palpation.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2018.
All research outputs
#9,644,591
of 32,030,936 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Glaucoma
#453
of 3,056 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,705
of 324,858 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Glaucoma
#9
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,030,936 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,056 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,858 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
