↓ Skip to main content

Securitizing Xinjiang: Police Recruitment, Informal Policing and Ethnic Minority Co-optation

Overview of attention for article published in China Quarterly, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#8 of 1,365)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
134 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Securitizing Xinjiang: Police Recruitment, Informal Policing and Ethnic Minority Co-optation
Published in
China Quarterly, July 2019
DOI 10.1017/s0305741019000778
Authors

Adrian Zenz, James Leibold

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 134 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 41 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 15%
Student > Bachelor 5 12%
Student > Master 4 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 2%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 19 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 16 39%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Unspecified 1 2%
Psychology 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 19 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 140. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2021.
All research outputs
#297,497
of 25,554,853 outputs
Outputs from China Quarterly
#8
of 1,365 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,902
of 361,005 outputs
Outputs of similar age from China Quarterly
#1
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,554,853 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,365 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,005 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.