↓ Skip to main content

Sitting at the Edge: How Biomolecules use Hydrophobicity to Tune Their Interactions and Function

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Physical Chemistry B, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
173 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Sitting at the Edge: How Biomolecules use Hydrophobicity to Tune Their Interactions and Function
Published in
Journal of Physical Chemistry B, February 2012
DOI 10.1021/jp2107523
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Water near extended hydrophobic surfaces is like that at a liquid-vapor interface, where fluctuations in water density are substantially enhanced compared to those in bulk water. Here we use molecular simulations with specialized sampling techniques to show that water density fluctuations are similarly enhanced, even near hydrophobic surfaces of complex biomolecules, situating them at the edge of a dewetting transition. Consequently, water near these surfaces is sensitive to subtle changes in surface conformation, topology, and chemistry, any of which can tip the balance toward or away from the wet state and thus significantly alter biomolecular interactions and function. Our work also resolves the long-standing puzzle of why some biological surfaces dewet and other seemingly similar surfaces do not.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 173 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 6 3%
Sweden 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 159 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 51 29%
Researcher 37 21%
Professor > Associate Professor 11 6%
Student > Master 9 5%
Other 8 5%
Other 29 17%
Unknown 28 16%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 54 31%
Physics and Astronomy 23 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 7%
Engineering 12 7%
Chemical Engineering 12 7%
Other 24 14%
Unknown 36 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2014.
All research outputs
#4,838,555
of 34,377,743 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Physical Chemistry B
#863
of 17,745 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,989
of 202,271 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Physical Chemistry B
#6
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,377,743 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,745 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,271 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.