↓ Skip to main content

Development of an Exergame for Urban-dwelling Older Adults With Functional Limitations: Results and Lessons Learned

Overview of attention for article published in Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
153 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Development of an Exergame for Urban-dwelling Older Adults With Functional Limitations: Results and Lessons Learned
Published in
Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action, March 2016
DOI 10.1353/cpr.2016.0005
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Falls at home are common and potentially fatal for disabled older adults. To address this problem, we created an academic-community partnership involving disabled, urban-dwelling older adults and their families, the housing authority, a Tai Chi master, and a university. We conducted a pilot to assess safety, acceptability, and feasibility of a Wii-based exergame designed to increase disabled older adults' strength and balance. A working prototype was developed and evaluated. Then, we piloted a refined version with 19 disabled urban-dwelling older adults. The program was enjoyable, feasible, and acceptable. Participants described multiple functional improvements. Of the 16 who completed at least three gaming sessions, average balance score increased 25% and gait speed increased 19%. This pilot showed promising results for improving strength and balance in the home setting, and yielded valuable lessons about health technology development with community partners.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 151 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 14%
Student > Bachelor 15 10%
Researcher 15 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 5%
Other 26 17%
Unknown 46 30%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 39 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 9%
Sports and Recreations 11 7%
Social Sciences 11 7%
Computer Science 8 5%
Other 17 11%
Unknown 53 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2016.
All research outputs
#23,329,066
of 34,410,315 outputs
Outputs from Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action
#252
of 393 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#205,029
of 336,445 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action
#7
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,315 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 393 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,445 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.