↓ Skip to main content

Anterior cruciate ligament strain and tensile forces for weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing exercises: a guide to exercise selection.

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#43 of 2,763)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
725 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Anterior cruciate ligament strain and tensile forces for weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing exercises: a guide to exercise selection.
Published in
Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, February 2012
DOI 10.2519/jospt.2012.3768
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 328 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 725 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 9 1%
Italy 4 <1%
Netherlands 3 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Luxembourg 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Other 4 <1%
Unknown 698 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 96 13%
Student > Master 80 11%
Other 67 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 59 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 50 7%
Other 115 16%
Unknown 258 36%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 191 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 91 13%
Sports and Recreations 83 11%
Engineering 37 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 2%
Other 32 4%
Unknown 274 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 256. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2025.
All research outputs
#182,491
of 34,603,176 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy
#43
of 2,763 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#634
of 203,128 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy
#1
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,603,176 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,763 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 203,128 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.