You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Widespread diminishing anthropogenic effects on calcium in freshwaters
|
---|---|
Published in |
Scientific Reports, July 2019
|
DOI | 10.1038/s41598-019-46838-w |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Gesa A. Weyhenmeyer, Jens Hartmann, Dag O. Hessen, Jiří Kopáček, Josef Hejzlar, Stéphan Jacquet, Stephen K. Hamilton, Piet Verburg, Taylor H. Leach, Martin Schmid, Giovanna Flaim, Tiina Nõges, Peeter Nõges, Valerie C. Wentzky, Michela Rogora, James A. Rusak, Sarian Kosten, Andrew M. Paterson, Katrin Teubner, Scott N. Higgins, Gregory Lawrence, Külli Kangur, Ilga Kokorite, Leonardo Cerasino, Clara Funk, Rebecca Harvey, Florentina Moatar, Heleen A. de Wit, Thomas Zechmeister |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 9 | 27% |
Canada | 4 | 12% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 6% |
Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | 3% |
Norway | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 16 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 25 | 76% |
Scientists | 5 | 15% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 6% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 101 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 20% |
Researcher | 16 | 16% |
Student > Master | 8 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
Other | 4 | 4% |
Other | 17 | 17% |
Unknown | 30 | 30% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 34 | 34% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 10 | 10% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 10% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 3% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 2% |
Other | 8 | 8% |
Unknown | 34 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2019.
All research outputs
#988,380
of 25,323,244 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#10,221
of 139,380 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,049
of 353,236 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#274
of 3,349 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,323,244 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 139,380 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,236 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,349 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.