↓ Skip to main content

A persistent misperception: assisted reproductive technology can reverse the “aged biological clock”

Overview of attention for article published in Fertility & Sterility, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
8 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
113 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
A persistent misperception: assisted reproductive technology can reverse the “aged biological clock”
Published in
Fertility & Sterility, March 2012
DOI 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.02.015
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Delaying motherhood should be a free choice made in full knowledge of all the consequences, but modern women have alarming misconceptions about their own reproductive systems and the effectiveness of assisted reproductive technologies. Doctors and health professionals must begin to discuss fertility preservation with their patients and make sure that young women truly understand all their options. Preventing age-related infertility is the responsibility not only of doctors and medical practitioners but also of society at large. Social, economic, and personal pressures are causing women to decide to conceive later in life, yet those who choose to delay motherhood are stigmatized as being selfish and unconcerned about starting a family. This stigma must be banished, and age-related infertility should be faced as a medical problem.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Italy 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 110 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 13%
Researcher 15 13%
Student > Bachelor 11 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Other 16 14%
Unknown 33 29%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 9%
Psychology 9 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 7%
Social Sciences 8 7%
Other 12 11%
Unknown 34 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2018.
All research outputs
#2,138,731
of 34,400,738 outputs
Outputs from Fertility & Sterility
#961
of 12,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,447
of 202,591 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Fertility & Sterility
#9
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,400,738 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,591 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.