↓ Skip to main content

Defining quality during ex vivo lung perfusion: The University of Maryland experience

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Defining quality during ex vivo lung perfusion: The University of Maryland experience
Published in
Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, June 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.06.018
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 24%
Student > Master 3 18%
Student > Bachelor 2 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 12%
Librarian 1 6%
Other 2 12%
Unknown 3 18%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 65%
Computer Science 1 6%
Materials Science 1 6%
Unknown 4 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2025.
All research outputs
#10,711,232
of 34,360,257 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
#3,831
of 10,262 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,700
of 304,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
#35
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,360,257 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,262 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 304,036 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.