↓ Skip to main content

Next generation sequencing: implications in personalized medicine and pharmacogenomics

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular BioSystems, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
184 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Next generation sequencing: implications in personalized medicine and pharmacogenomics
Published in
Molecular BioSystems, March 2016
DOI 10.1039/c6mb00115g
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

A breakthrough in next generation sequencing (NGS) in the last decade provided an unprecedented opportunity to investigate genetic variations in humans and their roles in health and disease. NGS offers regional genomic sequencing such as whole exome sequencing of coding regions of all genes, as well as whole genome sequencing. RNA-seq offers sequencing of the entire transcriptome and ChIP-seq allows for sequencing the epigenetic architecture of the genome. Identifying genetic variations in individuals can be used to predict disease risk, with the potential to halt or retard disease progression. NGS can also be used to predict the response to or adverse effects of drugs or to calculate appropriate drug dosage. Such a personalized medicine also provides the possibility to treat diseases based on the genetic makeup of the patient. Here, we review the basics of NGS technologies and their application in human diseases to foster human healthcare and personalized medicine.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 184 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Unknown 176 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 14%
Student > Master 25 14%
Researcher 23 13%
Student > Bachelor 20 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 5%
Other 28 15%
Unknown 52 28%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 38 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 24 13%
Computer Science 10 5%
Engineering 5 3%
Other 25 14%
Unknown 52 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2020.
All research outputs
#6,408,010
of 30,038,132 outputs
Outputs from Molecular BioSystems
#241
of 1,478 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,553
of 317,810 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular BioSystems
#10
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 30,038,132 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,478 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,810 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.