↓ Skip to main content

Neuronal clustering and fasciculation phenotype in Dscam‐ and Bax‐deficient mouse retinas

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Comparative Neurology, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Neuronal clustering and fasciculation phenotype in Dscam‐ and Bax‐deficient mouse retinas
Published in
The Journal of Comparative Neurology, March 2012
DOI 10.1002/cne.23033
Pubmed ID
Authors

Patrick W. Keeley, Buranee J. Sliff, Sammy C.S. Lee, Peter G. Fuerst, Robert W. Burgess, Stephen J. Eglen, Benjamin E. Reese

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2012.
All research outputs
#20,011,776
of 24,590,593 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Comparative Neurology
#3,156
of 3,779 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,997
of 159,909 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Comparative Neurology
#32
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,590,593 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,779 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 159,909 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.