↓ Skip to main content

Neuropathology for the neuroradiologist: rosettes and pseudorosettes.

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Neuroradiology, March 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
156 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Neuropathology for the neuroradiologist: rosettes and pseudorosettes.
Published in
American Journal of Neuroradiology, March 2006
Pubmed ID
Authors

F J Wippold, A Perry

Abstract

The neuropathologic diagnosis of brain tumors entails the microscopic examination of conventional formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue samples surgically removed from a radiographically defined lesion. A preliminary diagnosis is often rendered with frozen sections, though the final or definitive diagnosis usually requires more elaborate studies. Typically, the tissue is first fixed for a minimum of several hours in 10% neutral buffered formalin, processed through a series of dehydrating and clearing reagents, and embedded in a hardening wax, such as paraffin. The latter enables the tissue to be thinly sliced with a microtome, transferred to a glass slide, and then stained with dyes such as hematoxylin-eosin (H&E) that contrast the different cellular elements. Pathologists rely on visual clues such as pattern recognition when examining the stained tissue with a microscope, much as radiologists rely on gray-scale patterns of densities and intensities on images. Some histologic patterns of cellular architecture are distinctive if not pathognomonic, whereas others are less specific, but nevertheless considerably narrow the differential diagnosis. The precise biologic bases for some of the observed microscopic patterns are poorly understood, though their recognition remains useful nonetheless. Although more advanced methods of tissue examination--such as histochemical and immunohistochemical profiling, genetic analysis, and electron microscopy--have been developed, the microscopic review of H&E-stained material remains a critical component of tumor diagnosis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 156 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 1%
United States 2 1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 147 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 29 19%
Other 20 13%
Student > Postgraduate 17 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 9%
Other 46 29%
Unknown 16 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 82 53%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 9%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 12 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 6%
Neuroscience 5 3%
Other 13 8%
Unknown 20 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2023.
All research outputs
#6,375,394
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Neuroradiology
#1,518
of 5,256 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,595
of 92,116 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Neuroradiology
#3
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,256 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 92,116 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.