↓ Skip to main content

Theory-based strategies for teaching evidence-based practice to undergraduate health students: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Education, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Readers on

mendeley
259 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Theory-based strategies for teaching evidence-based practice to undergraduate health students: a systematic review
Published in
BMC Medical Education, July 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12909-019-1698-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 259 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 259 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 10%
Lecturer 18 7%
Researcher 15 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 5%
Student > Bachelor 12 5%
Other 51 20%
Unknown 125 48%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 53 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 32 12%
Social Sciences 11 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Other 27 10%
Unknown 127 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2022.
All research outputs
#10,179,671
of 31,715,198 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#2,264
of 5,300 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#136,792
of 377,587 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#43
of 117 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 31,715,198 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,300 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 377,587 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 117 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.