↓ Skip to main content

Ionic Thiocyanate (SCN-) Production from 4-Hydroxybenzyl Glucosinolate Contained in Sinapis alba Seed Meal

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Agricultural & Food Chemistry, September 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
4 patents
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Ionic Thiocyanate (SCN-) Production from 4-Hydroxybenzyl Glucosinolate Contained in Sinapis alba Seed Meal
Published in
Journal of Agricultural & Food Chemistry, September 2005
DOI 10.1021/jf051570r
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Meal produced from Sinapis alba seed by crushing to remove oil contains a glucosinolate that when hydrolyzed produces phytotoxic allelochemicals; however, the responsible compounds and pathways for their production have not been elucidated. S. alba seed meal and partially purified extracts containing 4-hydroxybenzyl glucosinolate were included in experiments to identify and monitor enzymatically released products using GC-MS and HPLC-MS. The initial product, 4-hydroxybenzyl isothiocyanate, was unstable in aqueous media, showing a half-life of 321 min at pH 3.0, decreasing to 6 min at pH 6.5. More alkaline pH values decrease the stability of 4-hydroxybenzyl isothiocyanate by promoting the formation of a proposed quinone that hydrolyzes to SCN-. Measurement of SCN- showed stoichiometric release from S. alba meal at 48 h when buffered at pH values as low as 4.0, demonstrating that SCN- production in soil is not only probable but likely responsible for observed phytoxicity of the meal.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Japan 1 2%
Unknown 52 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 17%
Researcher 8 15%
Student > Master 7 13%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Professor 4 8%
Other 9 17%
Unknown 12 23%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 51%
Environmental Science 3 6%
Chemistry 3 6%
Philosophy 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 14 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2024.
All research outputs
#3,778,828
of 34,364,397 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Agricultural & Food Chemistry
#2,288
of 25,810 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,107
of 100,720 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Agricultural & Food Chemistry
#30
of 185 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,364,397 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,810 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 100,720 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 185 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.