↓ Skip to main content

Comparing temperature data sources for use in species distribution models: From in‐situ logging to remote sensing

Overview of attention for article published in Global Ecology & Biogeography, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
46 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
198 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Comparing temperature data sources for use in species distribution models: From in‐situ logging to remote sensing
Published in
Global Ecology & Biogeography, July 2019
DOI 10.1111/geb.12974
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 46 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 198 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 198 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 43 22%
Researcher 35 18%
Student > Master 17 9%
Other 9 5%
Student > Bachelor 8 4%
Other 28 14%
Unknown 58 29%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 55 28%
Environmental Science 53 27%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 12 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Social Sciences 2 1%
Other 6 3%
Unknown 66 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2020.
All research outputs
#1,886,579
of 34,410,798 outputs
Outputs from Global Ecology & Biogeography
#316
of 2,344 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,496
of 390,127 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Global Ecology & Biogeography
#5
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,798 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,344 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 390,127 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.