↓ Skip to main content

Governmental Public Health In The United States: The Implications Of Federalism

Overview of attention for article published in Health Affairs, November 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
3 policy sources
twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Governmental Public Health In The United States: The Implications Of Federalism
Published in
Health Affairs, November 2002
DOI 10.1377/hlthaff.21.6.68
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bernard J Turnock, Christopher Atchison

Abstract

Governmental public health activities in the United States have evolved over time as a result of two forces: the nature and perceived importance of threats to the population's health and safety, and changing relationships among the various levels of government. Shifts toward a more state-centered form of federalism in the second half of the twentieth century weakened key aspects of the governmental public health enterprise, including its leadership and coordination, by the century's end. These developments challenge governmental public health responses to the new threats and increased societal expectations of the early twenty-first century.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 36%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 8%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 5%
Other 8 21%
Unknown 4 10%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 7 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 8%
Other 9 23%
Unknown 6 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2021.
All research outputs
#3,291,190
of 32,332,113 outputs
Outputs from Health Affairs
#3,764
of 6,952 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,044
of 71,013 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Affairs
#4
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,332,113 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,952 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 69.4. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 71,013 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.