| Title |
Learning from Accident and Error: Avoiding the Hazards of Workload, Stress, and Routine Interruptions in the Emergency Department
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Academic Emergency Medicine, December 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01231.x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors | |
| Abstract |
This article presents a model of how a build-up of interruptions can shift the dynamics of the emergency department (ED) from an adaptive, self-regulating system into a fragile, crisis-prone one. Drawing on case studies of organizational disasters and insights from the theory of high-reliability organizations, the authors use computer simulations to show how the accumulation of small interruptions could have disproportionately large effects in the ED. In the face of a mounting workload created by interruptions, EDs, like other organizational systems, have tipping points, thresholds beyond which a vicious cycle can lead rather quickly to the collapse of normal operating routines and in the extreme to a crisis of organizational paralysis. The authors discuss some possible implications for emergency medicine, emphasizing the potential threat from routine, non-novel demands on EDs and raising the concern that EDs are operating closer to the precipitous edge of crisis as ED crowding exacerbates the problem. |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 9 | 26% |
| United States | 8 | 23% |
| Canada | 5 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 9% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 7 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 21 | 60% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 29% |
| Scientists | 3 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 124 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 22 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 13% |
| Researcher | 16 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 32 | 25% |
| Unknown | 25 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 41 | 32% |
| Psychology | 12 | 9% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 11 | 9% |
| Engineering | 8 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 16 | 12% |
| Unknown | 33 | 26% |