You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
国内外来種を含む訪花性ハナムグリ亜科5 種の発生状況 ―東京港野鳥公園の事例―
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Japanese Journal of Conservation Ecology, April 2018
|
| DOI | 10.18960/hozen.22.1_159 |
| Authors |
岸本 圭子, 岸本 年郎, 酒井 香, 寺山 守, 太田 祐司, 高桑 正敏 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2024.
All research outputs
#16,376,857
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Conservation Ecology
#151
of 206 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#200,127
of 345,528 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Conservation Ecology
#6
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 206 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.7. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,528 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.