↓ Skip to main content

Twin Reversed Arterial Perfusion Sequence (TRAPS): An Illustrative Series of 13 Cases

Overview of attention for article published in Fetal & Pediatric Pathology, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#8 of 239)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Twin Reversed Arterial Perfusion Sequence (TRAPS): An Illustrative Series of 13 Cases
Published in
Fetal & Pediatric Pathology, February 2016
DOI 10.3109/15513815.2015.1131785
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Twin reversed-arterial-perfusion sequence (TRAPS) is a rare and severe complication of monochorionic twin pregnancies. It usually occurs in the setting of monochorionic placentation, when the heart of a normal appearing twin serves as the pump for one or more dysmorphic twins whose head, thoracic organs, and upper extremities do not fully develop or do not develop at all and thus lack cardiac activity. Anomalous vascular placental architecture causes a shift in arterial flow towards the acardiac twin(s). The exact physiopathologic mechanisms that lead to this devastating phenomenon are not well known. We reviewed the maternal history and the surgical pathology reports of the fetuses and placentas of 13 different cases of TRAPS that were collected in a 23-year study period at a single institution. Herein we summarize the characteristic findings and illustrate specific mechanical feto-placental circulation issues that appear to be instrumental in the development of TRAPS.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 13%
Student > Master 2 13%
Researcher 2 13%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Other 4 25%
Unknown 4 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 56%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 19%
Unknown 4 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2022.
All research outputs
#4,391,838
of 34,447,360 outputs
Outputs from Fetal & Pediatric Pathology
#8
of 239 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,041
of 452,182 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Fetal & Pediatric Pathology
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,447,360 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 239 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,182 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them