| Title |
TRIBE: Hijacking an RNA-Editing Enzyme to Identify Cell-Specific Targets of RNA-Binding Proteins
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cell, March 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.cell.2016.03.007 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors | |
| Abstract |
RNA transcripts are bound and regulated by RNA-binding proteins (RBPs). Current methods for identifying in vivo targets of an RBP are imperfect and not amenable to examining small numbers of cells. To address these issues, we developed TRIBE (targets of RNA-binding proteins identified by editing), a technique that couples an RBP to the catalytic domain of the Drosophila RNA-editing enzyme ADAR and expresses the fusion protein in vivo. RBP targets are marked with novel RNA editing events and identified by sequencing RNA. We have used TRIBE to identify the targets of three RBPs (Hrp48, dFMR1, and NonA). TRIBE compares favorably to other methods, including CLIP, and we have identified RBP targets from as little as 150 specific fly neurons. TRIBE can be performed without an antibody and in small numbers of specific cells. |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 28 | 37% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 9% |
| Japan | 3 | 4% |
| Canada | 3 | 4% |
| India | 2 | 3% |
| France | 2 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 22 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 37 | 49% |
| Scientists | 32 | 42% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 8% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Germany | 3 | <1% |
| Poland | 1 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 664 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 176 | 26% |
| Researcher | 112 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 59 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 53 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 30 | 4% |
| Other | 92 | 13% |
| Unknown | 161 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 241 | 35% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 171 | 25% |
| Neuroscience | 37 | 5% |
| Chemistry | 20 | 3% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 2% |
| Other | 39 | 6% |
| Unknown | 161 | 24% |