↓ Skip to main content

Brainhack: a collaborative workshop for the open neuroscience community

Overview of attention for article published in Giga Science, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
36 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Readers on

mendeley
145 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Brainhack: a collaborative workshop for the open neuroscience community
Published in
Giga Science, March 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13742-016-0121-x
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Brainhack events offer a novel workshop format with participant-generated content that caters to the rapidly growing open neuroscience community. Including components from hackathons and unconferences, as well as parallel educational sessions, Brainhack fosters novel collaborations around the interests of its attendees. Here we provide an overview of its structure, past events, and example projects. Additionally, we outline current innovations such as regional events and post-conference publications. Through introducing Brainhack to the wider neuroscience community, we hope to provide a unique conference format that promotes the features of collaborative, open science.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Netherlands 3 2%
United States 2 1%
Japan 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 138 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 15%
Student > Master 15 10%
Professor 9 6%
Student > Bachelor 8 6%
Other 27 19%
Unknown 41 28%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 23 16%
Computer Science 13 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 8%
Psychology 11 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 6%
Other 33 23%
Unknown 45 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2025.
All research outputs
#1,336,674
of 34,400,738 outputs
Outputs from Giga Science
#149
of 1,496 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,288
of 339,185 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Giga Science
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,400,738 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,496 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,185 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them