↓ Skip to main content

Dredging in the Spratly Islands: Gaining Land but Losing Reefs

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Biology, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
69 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Dredging in the Spratly Islands: Gaining Land but Losing Reefs
Published in
PLoS Biology, March 2016
DOI 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002422
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Coral reefs on remote islands and atolls are less exposed to direct human stressors but are becoming increasingly vulnerable because of their development for geopolitical and military purposes. Here we document dredging and filling activities by countries in the South China Sea, where building new islands and channels on atolls is leading to considerable losses of, and perhaps irreversible damages to, unique coral reef ecosystems. Preventing similar damage across other reefs in the region necessitates the urgent development of cooperative management of disputed territories in the South China Sea. We suggest using the Antarctic Treaty as a positive precedent for such international cooperation.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 69 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 1%
Unknown 73 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 23%
Researcher 13 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Other 4 5%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 17 23%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 24%
Environmental Science 14 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 5%
Engineering 3 4%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 25 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 90. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2025.
All research outputs
#601,920
of 34,545,128 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Biology
#1,032
of 7,829 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,252
of 339,731 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Biology
#15
of 92 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,545,128 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,829 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 56.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,731 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 92 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.