↓ Skip to main content

Receptor-type Guanylyl Cyclases Confer Thermosensory Responses in C. elegans

Overview of attention for article published in Neuron, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Receptor-type Guanylyl Cyclases Confer Thermosensory Responses in C. elegans
Published in
Neuron, March 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.neuron.2016.03.002
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Thermosensation is critical for optimal regulation of physiology and behavior. C. elegans acclimates to its cultivation temperature (Tc) and exhibits thermosensitive behaviors at temperatures relative to Tc. These behaviors are mediated primarily by the AFD sensory neurons, which are extraordinarily thermosensitive and respond to thermal fluctuations at temperatures above a Tc-determined threshold. Although cGMP signaling is necessary for thermotransduction, the thermosensors in AFD are unknown. We show that AFD-specific receptor guanylyl cyclases (rGCs) are instructive for thermosensation. In addition to being necessary for thermotransduction, ectopic expression of these rGCs confers highly temperature-dependent responses onto diverse cell types. We find that the temperature response threshold is determined by the rGC and cellular context, and that multiple domains contribute to their thermosensory properties. Identification of thermosensory rGCs in C. elegans provides insight into mechanisms of thermosensation and thermal acclimation and suggests that rGCs may represent a new family of molecular thermosensors.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 77 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 28%
Researcher 11 14%
Student > Bachelor 9 11%
Student > Master 8 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 14 18%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 24%
Neuroscience 18 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 3%
Engineering 2 3%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 15 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2018.
All research outputs
#9,152,010
of 34,205,147 outputs
Outputs from Neuron
#6,910
of 10,816 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,725
of 339,514 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuron
#89
of 125 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,205,147 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,816 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.0. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,514 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 125 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.