You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Airborne concentrations and chemical considerations of radioactive ruthenium from an undeclared major nuclear release in 2017
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1073/pnas.1907571116 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
O. Masson, G. Steinhauser, D. Zok, O. Saunier, H. Angelov, D. Babić, V. Bečková, J. Bieringer, M. Bruggeman, C. I. Burbidge, S. Conil, A. Dalheimer, L.-E. De Geer, A. de Vismes Ott, K. Eleftheriadis, S. Estier, H. Fischer, M. G. Garavaglia, C. Gasco Leonarte, K. Gorzkiewicz, D. Hainz, I. Hoffman, M. Hýža, K. Isajenko, T. Karhunen, J. Kastlander, C. Katzlberger, R. Kierepko, G.-J. Knetsch, J. Kövendiné Kónyi, M. Lecomte, J. W. Mietelski, P. Min, B. Møller, S. P. Nielsen, J. Nikolic, L. Nikolovska, I. Penev, B. Petrinec, P. P. Povinec, R. Querfeld, O. Raimondi, D. Ransby, W. Ringer, O. Romanenko, R. Rusconi, P. R. J. Saey, V. Samsonov, B. Šilobritienė, E. Simion, C. Söderström, M. Šoštarić, T. Steinkopff, P. Steinmann, I. Sýkora, L. Tabachnyi, D. Todorovic, E. Tomankiewicz, J. Tschiersch, R. Tsibranski, M. Tzortzis, K. Ungar, A. Vidic, A. Weller, H. Wershofen, P. Zagyvai, T. Zalewska, D. Zapata García, B. Zorko |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 335 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 32 | 10% |
| France | 17 | 5% |
| Japan | 16 | 5% |
| Spain | 14 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 11 | 3% |
| Germany | 6 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 6 | 2% |
| Ukraine | 4 | 1% |
| Brazil | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 46 | 14% |
| Unknown | 179 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 289 | 86% |
| Scientists | 30 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 11 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 100 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 31 | 31% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 12% |
| Other | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 12% |
| Unknown | 25 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 18 | 18% |
| Chemistry | 16 | 16% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 10 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 5% |
| Engineering | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 13% |
| Unknown | 33 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1069. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2024.
All research outputs
#14,800
of 25,801,916 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#471
of 103,763 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#236
of 360,973 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#12
of 935 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,801,916 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103,763 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,973 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 935 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.