↓ Skip to main content

Lymphomatous involvement of the central nervous system

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Radiology, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Lymphomatous involvement of the central nervous system
Published in
Clinical Radiology, March 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.crad.2016.02.006
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Lymphoma may arise within the central nervous system (CNS), known as primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL) or may involve the CNS secondary to systemic disease. Clinical features are non-specific. A provisional diagnosis of PCNSL can be made on imaging, potentially changing the management algorithm from neurosurgical resection to biopsy. PCNSL in immunocompetent patients generally presents late, is solid, is bright on diffusion weighted imaging and shows uniform enhancement. Contiguity with a cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) surface and perivascular enhancement are useful clues. Immunocompromised patients, on the other hand, present earlier and often have multiple, necrotic, haemorrhagic lesions with irregular or rim enhancement. Secondary CNS involvement predominantly affects the leptomeninges. This review illustrates the varied imaging features of CNS lymphoma, atypical presentations, and differential diagnoses.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 5 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 11%
Researcher 4 11%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 6%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 12 34%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 46%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Physics and Astronomy 1 3%
Neuroscience 1 3%
Unknown 15 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2016.
All research outputs
#22,758,309
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Radiology
#1,768
of 2,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#272,082
of 315,018 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Radiology
#46
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,162 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,018 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.