Chronotype and Social Jetlag: A (Self-) Critical Review

Overview of attention for article published in Biology, July 2019

Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#5 of 5,356)
High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news: 49 news outlets
blogs: 5 blogs
policy: 2 policy sources
twitter: 24 X users
facebook: 1 Facebook page

wikipedia: 2 Wikipedia pages
reddit: 2 Redditors
video: 6 YouTube creators
bluesky: 1 Bluesky user
podcasts: 2 podcasts

Readers on

mendeley: 681 Mendeley

So far, Altmetric has seen 34 X posts from 24 X users, with an upper bound of 70,675 followers.

Want to dig deeper? The references we used were: https://t.co/ybHorjAltR https://t.co/3n0uzqURgX https://t.co/qM9JwvdA32 https://t.co/wrH2mWy4Te

Social jetlag ☺️ https://t.co/ue9yNhVE1Q

@SleepAndSports The article above does however suggest MCTQ/chronotype is slightly better than MEQ vs DLMO. Other studies have found correlations similar results, eg https://t.co/zb5Kcfy6ax Roenneberg had a discussion of pro/cons of MCTQ/chronotype vs …

RT @MichlDeutsch: @maithi_nk @maithinkx 👍 Bitte mal Sendung z.chronobiol.Fakten,zB 95,5% d.Menschen könnten gesünder+produktiver s., würde…

This page shows the most recent X posts that mention this research output. Click here to find out how to access more activity, including 30 additional X posts.