You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Designing Democratic Innovations as Deliberative Systems: The Ambitious Case of NHS Citizen
|
---|---|
Published in |
Political Studies, July 2019
|
DOI | 10.1177/0032321719866002 |
Authors |
Rikki Dean, John Boswell, Graham Smith |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 62 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 26 | 42% |
Australia | 2 | 3% |
Mexico | 2 | 3% |
South Africa | 2 | 3% |
Canada | 2 | 3% |
Austria | 1 | 2% |
Sweden | 1 | 2% |
Brazil | 1 | 2% |
United States | 1 | 2% |
Other | 2 | 3% |
Unknown | 22 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 40 | 65% |
Scientists | 19 | 31% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 65 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 17% |
Researcher | 8 | 12% |
Student > Master | 6 | 9% |
Lecturer | 4 | 6% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 6% |
Other | 14 | 22% |
Unknown | 18 | 28% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 30 | 46% |
Arts and Humanities | 3 | 5% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 5% |
Environmental Science | 2 | 3% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 3% |
Other | 6 | 9% |
Unknown | 19 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 50. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2020.
All research outputs
#835,911
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Political Studies
#80
of 1,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,849
of 358,855 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Political Studies
#6
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,240 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,855 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.