↓ Skip to main content

Strengthening And stretching for Rheumatoid Arthritis of the Hand (SARAH). A randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation.

Overview of attention for article published in Health technology assessment : HTA / NHS R & D HTA Programme., March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#8 of 1,480)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
26 news outlets
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
403 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Strengthening And stretching for Rheumatoid Arthritis of the Hand (SARAH). A randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation.
Published in
Health technology assessment : HTA / NHS R & D HTA Programme., March 2015
DOI 10.3310/hta19190
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 403 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Italy 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 401 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 55 14%
Student > Bachelor 54 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 24 6%
Researcher 22 5%
Other 19 5%
Other 62 15%
Unknown 167 41%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 74 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 64 16%
Sports and Recreations 18 4%
Psychology 13 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 12 3%
Other 42 10%
Unknown 180 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 222. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2024.
All research outputs
#219,630
of 34,601,305 outputs
Outputs from Health technology assessment : HTA / NHS R & D HTA Programme.
#8
of 1,480 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,011
of 297,838 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health technology assessment : HTA / NHS R & D HTA Programme.
#2
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,601,305 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,480 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 297,838 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.