↓ Skip to main content

The perception of role conflict in sexual assault nursing and its effects on care delivery

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of forensic nursing (Online), March 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The perception of role conflict in sexual assault nursing and its effects on care delivery
Published in
Journal of forensic nursing (Online), March 2012
DOI 10.1111/j.1939-3938.2012.01135.x
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The role of the sexual assault nurse examiner (SANE) combines two once-distinct roles--nursing and forensic science. Therefore, there is a potential for role conflict that may impact SANEs as well as the care they deliver. In this qualitative study, 14 SANEs were interviewed regarding their roles. Most participants did not endorse role conflict; however, most also provided examples of conflict between their roles as nurses and their roles as evidence collectors. Participants differed in their opinions of whether they were advocates or not in this capacity. SANEs talked about breaking the rules and caring about some patients even when they believed they were not supposed to. Several SANEs also talked about relying on the victim advocate to take the caring role-in effect, using advocates as proxy for the caring role SANEs would take in other nursing settings. The implications of these findings are discussed.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Unknown 36 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 11%
Researcher 4 11%
Lecturer 3 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Other 6 16%
Unknown 12 32%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 14%
Psychology 5 14%
Social Sciences 5 14%
Unknown 13 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2012.
All research outputs
#24,755,224
of 34,362,729 outputs
Outputs from Journal of forensic nursing (Online)
#204
of 316 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#150,205
of 203,257 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of forensic nursing (Online)
#6
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,362,729 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 316 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 203,257 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.