↓ Skip to main content

Addressing Therapeutic Boundaries in Social Networking

Overview of attention for article published in Psychiatry: Interpersonal & Biological Processes, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Readers on

mendeley
112 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Addressing Therapeutic Boundaries in Social Networking
Published in
Psychiatry: Interpersonal & Biological Processes, March 2012
DOI 10.1521/psyc.2012.75.1.40
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Facebook is the leading social networking website, with over 500 million users. Prior studies have shown an increasing number of housestaff accessing the site. While Facebook can be used to foster camaraderie, it can also create difficulties in the doctor-patient relationship, especially when boundaries are crossed. This study explored the prevalence of such boundary crossings and offers recommendations for training. An anonymous voluntary survey regarding Facebook use was distributed to current psychiatry residents through the American Psychiatric Association (APA) listserv. Of the 182 respondents, 95.7% had current Facebook profiles, and 9.7% had received friend requests from patients. In addition, 18.7% admitted to viewing patient profiles on Facebook. There is a substantial utilization of Facebook among psychiatric residents as compared with prior studies. Specific guidance regarding social media websites and the potential for ethical difficulties should be offered to trainees.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Turkey 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 106 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 16%
Student > Bachelor 15 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 10%
Researcher 10 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 7%
Other 25 22%
Unknown 25 22%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 30%
Social Sciences 13 12%
Psychology 12 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 8%
Computer Science 5 4%
Other 9 8%
Unknown 30 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2013.
All research outputs
#10,914,916
of 33,977,172 outputs
Outputs from Psychiatry: Interpersonal & Biological Processes
#279
of 718 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,994
of 202,035 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychiatry: Interpersonal & Biological Processes
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,977,172 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 718 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,035 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.