↓ Skip to main content

Lessons Learned in Recruitment and Retention of Stroke Survivors

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of neuroscience nursing, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
124 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Lessons Learned in Recruitment and Retention of Stroke Survivors
Published in
Journal of neuroscience nursing, April 2012
DOI 10.1097/jnn.0b013e3182478c96
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Recruitment and retention are considered among the most challenging steps in the research process. This becomes especially significant when the research population is stroke survivors with complex health needs and poststroke sequelae. The purpose of this article was to set forth and discuss challenges, barriers, and strategies in recruitment and retention of stroke survivors in a pilot study. This pilot study was carried out to assess the feasibility and effectiveness of problem-solving therapy for prevention and treatment of poststroke depression and for enhancement of quality of life, utilizing a randomized controlled design. Twenty-seven patients were recruited, and of those, 22 were retained and randomized to 2 groups. Treatment group participants (n = 11) received 10 weeks of problem-solving therapy by a trained nurse, and control group participants (n = 11) received 10 weeks of telephone calls only. Both groups were followed up to 3 months after intervention completion. Careful field notes were recorded throughout the study to guide future larger scale studies. Challenges revolved around being accommodative to stroke survivors' schedules, establishing realistic inclusion and exclusion criteria, and providing incentives to the study participants in the control group. Recommendations include careful planning and organization of study procedures, soliciting feedback and support from physicians and administrative staff on the unit early in the process, developing a collaborative relationship with multidisciplinary staff, and continuously monitoring progress and implementing changes as needed.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 121 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 13%
Researcher 15 12%
Student > Master 13 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 10%
Student > Bachelor 12 10%
Other 19 15%
Unknown 37 30%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 28 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 13%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Neuroscience 4 3%
Other 11 9%
Unknown 40 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2012.
All research outputs
#28,784,103
of 34,563,371 outputs
Outputs from Journal of neuroscience nursing
#859
of 1,214 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#173,594
of 209,399 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of neuroscience nursing
#3
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,563,371 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,214 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,399 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.