↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
180 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Repetitive vascular occlusion stimulus (RVOS) versus standard care to prevent muscle wasting in critically ill patients (ROSProx):a study protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial
Published in
Trials, July 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13063-019-3547-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 180 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 180 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 29 16%
Student > Master 29 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 6%
Researcher 10 6%
Other 24 13%
Unknown 66 37%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 30 17%
Sports and Recreations 20 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 1%
Other 8 4%
Unknown 69 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2024.
All research outputs
#19,739,766
of 32,360,424 outputs
Outputs from Trials
#3,731
of 7,167 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#200,831
of 379,519 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trials
#82
of 170 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,360,424 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,167 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 379,519 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 170 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.