↓ Skip to main content

Which Patients Do Not Require a GH Stimulation Test for the Diagnosis of Adult GH Deficiency?

Overview of attention for article published in JCEM, February 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
guideline
6 clinical guideline sources

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Which Patients Do Not Require a GH Stimulation Test for the Diagnosis of Adult GH Deficiency?
Published in
JCEM, February 2002
DOI 10.1210/jcem.87.2.8216
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Germany 2 3%
Unknown 61 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 14%
Other 8 12%
Student > Master 7 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Other 16 25%
Unknown 16 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 65%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Psychology 1 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 16 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2025.
All research outputs
#2,438,957
of 34,457,357 outputs
Outputs from JCEM
#2,271
of 20,911 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,915
of 185,587 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JCEM
#12
of 170 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,457,357 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,911 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 185,587 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 170 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.