| Title |
A Typology of Innovations in Nursing.
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Nursing Administration, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1097/nna.0000000000000773 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
M Lindell Joseph, Diane L Huber, Heather Bair, Sue Moorhead, Kirsten Hanrahan |
| Abstract |
The purposes of this project were to identify innovations conceived from nurse faculty at a college of nursing and nurses in an academic medical center, examine their characteristics, and create a typology of nursing innovations. Innovation is a crucial component for progress in healthcare. Jobs to Be Done Theory suggests that to make progress in nursing, workers must be solution focused to answer problems. This qualitative study used directed content analysis to evaluate survey responses of nurses in 1 university's academic and practice setting about solutions or innovations to achieve progress in their jobs. Fifty-seven examples of situations needing an innovative solution were coded and categorized by challenges to yield an 8 characteristic typology in nursing innovation. These findings serve as a guide for nurse executives to understand and leverage how innovations are conceptualized and translated in academia and practice. |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 47% |
| France | 1 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 7 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 53% |
| Scientists | 4 | 24% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 24% |
Mendeley demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 33 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 9% |
| Librarian | 2 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 15% |
| Unknown | 12 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 33% |
| Psychology | 3 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 12 | 36% |